![]() |
"Southpaw", charcoal, by Connie Chadwell |
-- Michael
Sadlier, in Anthony Trollope: A Commentary
Until
I read Mr. Sadlier’s essay, I would never have considered using the words
“acquiescent” and “pugnacious” in a discussion of how to live a good life, but
he used them so appropriately in his treatise on the Victorian novelist that I
begin wondering whether a truly successful person has to be, you might
say, pugnaciously acquiescent. It’s thought-provoking that the word
“acquiesce” derives from the Latin word for “quiet”, for it suggests that an
acquiescent person is simply one who finds more reasons for inner peace and
quiet than for unease and apprehension. The word literally means “to be at
rest”, which summons up a picture of a person who treats whatever happens in
life as a noteworthy occurrence that should be quietly welcomed and walked
around and appraised. This is a person who knows that little can be gained by
giving battle, but that surprising strength can be gained through simple
acceptance. To be sure, I’m not speaking about a submissive and spineless
acceptance, but rather a pugnacious one – the kind of acquiescence that says,
in feisty tones, “Yes, I’m brave enough to say yes to life as it shows itself
to me, life as it truly is.” It’s a courageous kind of acquiescence, more
willing to wonder and marvel at life’s occurrences than condemn and castigate
them. Of course, there will be times when, for one reason or another, events
will deserve a person’s censure, but the censure should be given with the same
humble acquiescence -- the same sense of quietly accepting what simply needs to
be done. A person can be both tough and soft, both stern and merciful. It’s
like being sweet-tempered, but with boxing gloves on.
No comments:
Post a Comment